Women working in arts and culture face the double blow of the gender pay gap and the cultural sector pay gap, which continues to widen. Sector-wide transparency might go some way to achieving equity
Equal Pay Day is the day in the calendar that marks the disparity between men and women’s pay. The date changes each year, depending on how badly we’re doing in creating social equity, but the premise is simple. The TUC breaks down the pay gap in a way that many of us can almost feel: it surmises that the average woman in the UK must work 52 extra days (nearly two months) before she starts getting paid in comparison to the average man.
But there’s another layer to add to the gloom sandwich: the cultural sector’s gender pay gap. Recent data from the Department for Culture, Media and Sport confirms that for the second year in a row, the gender pay gap in the cultural industries has increased. And salaries in the arts already lag behind that of other areas.
The cultural sector pays women 15.2% less than men – this compares to a 14.2% gap in other industries. This means that women working in arts and culture face a double blow: the gender pay gap and the cultural sector pay gap. But there’s an intersection of society that’s less visible in the reporting of economic disparity.
Gender pay gap data is taken from the government’s detailed Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, which does not provide a breakdown by ethnicity or disability status. We are left to estimate how bad the pay gap is for marginalised communities by joining the dots with other data. Last year, the TUC reported that disabled people are three times more likely to be economically inactive and experience a 14.6% pay disparity between their earnings and those of non-disabled workers. Similarly, Black (Caribbean and African heritage) people, according to ONS data, earn 5.6% less than their white counterparts. Identity adds nuance to gender-pay disparity.
Continues...
But there’s action that the cultural sector can take that doesn’t require additional equality reporting. At The Stage’s Future of Theatre conference, an idea was punted that attracted widespread support: that theatre should publish box-office figures routinely, transparently and unanimously. It allows for a dynamic, intelligence-driven and smoother-functioning business, as well as regulating pricing.
If pay rates were more consistent across theatre, and pay scales were agreed sector-wide with transparency, the onus to navigate out of disadvantage would shift away from the creatives. Alignment of sector pay could yield dividends for pay equity.
Individuals can make a difference too: platforms such as Glassdoor can be a useful resource to build collective intelligence on pay rates – nearly 3,000 theatre producers have already shared their reality there. The more that people do this, the better intelligence can be used to make improvements.
As we’re now in a new financial year, how about reviving a New Year’s tradition? Instead of self-improvement, how about a sector-wide, financial one? This would have a far longer-lasting benefit than any 5k run.
Invest in The Stage today with a subscription starting at just £7.99