When theatre advertising is misleading, it lets down audiences as well as the critics misquoted
There are some things you don’t put on theatre posters. I’m thinking of the alternative titles given to shows such as the mercifully forgotten musical about the last days of Ernest Hemingway. Now, you’re probably thinking: “He’s kidding. No sane person would write a musical about that most doggedly rugged of writers who ended it all by taking his own life.” But you’d be wrong.
In 2009, Too Close to the Sun limped through two weeks in the West End, during which some genius renamed it Ernie Get Your Gun. Before that, a revival of Annie Get Your Gun with a leading lady with pop history but no theatre chops, was rechristened backstage as Annie Get Your P45.
Neither of those, naturally, appeared on the marketing material. But advertising copy that does wind up being used is sometimes more fanciful than factual.
Take Lempicka, the new Broadway bio-musical about the painter Tamara de Lempicka. The reviews weren’t great (he said politely). Despite praise for the cast, almost no one thought it worked. The reviews tally was one good review, 10 that were so-so, including our own, eight downright bad ones (one even exhumed Diana: the Musical as a comparison) and an absolute stinker in the New York Post. Its critic, Johnny Oleksinski, never one to mince words, declared: “And so, the ugly splatter that audiences are left to parse is a ridiculous two-and-half-hour Eurovision act with stratospheric delusions of grandeur.”
I quote that last sentence in full because the show’s producers have not seen fit to play by that rule.
The mood at the advertising agency the morning after the reviews hit can hardly have been gladsome, with the question facing them: how to spin gold from straw? The answer, as Michael Schulman at the New Yorker pointed out on Twitter/X, was placing an advert in the influential New York Times. Beneath the words “True art sparks debate”, the ad quoted opposing one-liners from two Times reviews: “A stirring blockbuster” – Ben Brantley and: “An overeager blur” – Jesse Green.
Continues...
Truth in advertising is important, not least because quotes are designed to get people to spend money and the Lempicka top price is a hefty $269 (£217). But Schulman smelt a rat, not least because Green succeeded Brantley as the Times’ theatre critic more than three years ago. Brantley’s review was for an earlier incarnation of the show way back in 2018.
It gets worse. None of the words quoted from either critic appeared in print consecutively. Those phrases were assembled from words that weren’t originally even in the same paragraph, let alone sentence.
The marketeer’s job is to present a show in its best possible light, so a degree of judicious editing to encourage people to see it is generally accepted. But there are limits and making up quotes is way past them. The ad, unsurprisingly, was pulled.
Interestingly, pre-Brexit, it wouldn’t have been possible to try that ploy here and, around a decade ago, I was slightly stunned to learn that I was part of the reason why.
A degree of editing is acceptable in marketing, but making up quotes is beyond the limit
At lunch at a theatregoing friend’s house with people I’d not met before, conversation turned to reviews. I told them about being misquoted after reviewing Zipp!, an enervating, lazy whistle-stop tour through 100 musicals in 90 minutes.
Listing its many infelicities, I had written: “The Sweeney Todd sequence is built around the rhyme: ‘He’s got a chopper/ Oh, it’s a whopper.’ If schoolboy innuendo is your bag, book now.” Passing the Duchess Theatre a little later, I was less than pleased to see my name outside accompanied just two words from my review: “Book now.” After my complaint and much-feigned innocence and wringing of hands, the producers finally took it down.
To my astonishment, one of the lunch guests piped up: “It’s you! I know that story because I drafted the EU directive on false advertising. You’re cited in European case law.” The trouble is that post-Brexit, EU directives no longer apply.
Occasionally, dodgy marketing is almost applaudable. The (dire) musical Troubadour opened in the West End in December 1980 but closed three months later. According to legend, in January a banner went up: “Now in its second year!”
But as the Lempicka story shows, calling out misrepresentation and mis-selling is obviously a good thing for audiences. Without the truthful use of criticism, there is only marketing. Or, in this instance, swindling.
Invest in The Stage today with a subscription starting at just £7.99